Halo 4 vs. Call of Duty Black Ops 2

Black Ops 2 and the rest of the Call of Duty games are all well known for the multiplayer although I find their multiplayer to be quite repetitive it’s the same thing over and over you kill a guy then die that’s what it mostly is. All game modes are alike there’s not really a difference between hardcore and regular except you die faster. Whenever I play Call of Duty I find it the same every time because I shoot a guy million times and he doesn't die than he shoots me twice and I die instantly, it could be lack of skill but I strongly disagree with that. Although I do like Call of Duty’s large arsenal of weapons I feel as if that changes my opinion about the game. I believe that Call of Duty is played by people who are not gamers but 7 and 18 year old people who do not deserve the title “Gamer.” With Halo’s multiplayer it’s a much different story usually the maps are a tiny bit smaller but that does not change the game play at all sometimes it depends which game modes you are playing. Halo also offers vehicles in certain game modes which makes it more fun but challenging sometimes, which Call of Duty clearly lacks. Although Halo’s multiplayer can be repetitive it is not as much as Call of Duty’s. Halo’s weapon arsenal is smaller. Forge is also a game changer because there’s nothing better than playing with your friends on your map. Black Ops 2’s campaign is a little strange because zooming years in the future from the first game then trying to cover it up with missions of the past is pathetic I believe it does not have much of a connection with the first game at all making it mediocre. Halo 4’s campaign had a spectacular story picking up right after the third game, which is pretty awesome how it stays connected with the third one. Halo 4’s campaign has constant action and introduces new enemies never seen in the halo universe making it very interesting. I believe that Halo wins this battle very slightly please post comments and who you think should have won. Thank you.